Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 20:39:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CFBEE464DCAC2D56A5E3EB1A0A70B9407024581865FF96964C1D0F267AE94FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN because it is factually correct. The note above indicating that a Reuter's article says the teen doesn't have to pay the fine is NOT contained in the article. Therefore, that note is factually misleading and therefore without proof, there is no note needed nor does it help https://t.co/qRRCj71LAM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757852947206095100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5CFBEE464DCAC2D56A5E3EB1A0A70B9407024581865FF96964C1D0F267AE94FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1707943180951
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17578529472060951005CFBEE464DCAC2D56A5E3EB1A0A70B9407024581865FF96964C1D0F267AE94FB