Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-15 08:09:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 346BE4F16E9D7FF9659EE9956690A8EF79B83AAA70DEF9092145693B09FBCED4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN because it is factually correct. The note above indicating that a Reuter's article says the teen doesn't have to pay the fine is NOT contained in the article. Therefore, that note is factually misleading and therefore without proof, there is no note needed nor does it help https://t.co/qRRCj71LAM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757852947206095100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 346BE4F16E9D7FF9659EE9956690A8EF79B83AAA70DEF9092145693B09FBCED4
  • createdAtMillis - 1707984548678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757852947206095100346BE4F16E9D7FF9659EE9956690A8EF79B83AAA70DEF9092145693B09FBCED4