Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-16 06:05:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFA43168F98B850A6B52789F53A4D0DFFFE527E03951EC5128EFCB88898E0D5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is published in Guardian Comment, which is for opinion. It is the writers opinion. It refers to both facts and opinions in the normal style of an opinion article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757841461368778892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFA43168F98B850A6B52789F53A4D0DFFFE527E03951EC5128EFCB88898E0D5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1708063515569
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757841461368778892BFA43168F98B850A6B52789F53A4D0DFFFE527E03951EC5128EFCB88898E0D5D