Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-15 21:52:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77F4EAE21F693FCF8A318B76529BA1EAB731ADFDDADD41B2FA0A02BAD02CDD89
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is published in Guardian Comment, which is for opinion. It is the writers opinion. It refers to both facts and opinions in the normal style of an opinion article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757841461368778892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77F4EAE21F693FCF8A318B76529BA1EAB731ADFDDADD41B2FA0A02BAD02CDD89
  • createdAtMillis - 1708033950611
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175784146136877889277F4EAE21F693FCF8A318B76529BA1EAB731ADFDDADD41B2FA0A02BAD02CDD89