Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-15 13:49:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29AC10CC5C6E7C9B8B9D7143DB6C2F856A00E80FB28B6842834BFB18CD738B4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is published in Guardian Comment, which is for opinion. It is the writers opinion. It refers to both facts and opinions in the normal style of an opinion article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757841461368778892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29AC10CC5C6E7C9B8B9D7143DB6C2F856A00E80FB28B6842834BFB18CD738B4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1708004997400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175784146136877889229AC10CC5C6E7C9B8B9D7143DB6C2F856A00E80FB28B6842834BFB18CD738B4D