Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 20:57:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F05003FBC3492B2DB0E47EF487B5EC91C966FAB620A1572D2A501D9FCF3B44F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regardless of your view on AI art, there is no requirement to explicitly state that AI art is such. Please keep the investigations to the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757751967437242628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F05003FBC3492B2DB0E47EF487B5EC91C966FAB620A1572D2A501D9FCF3B44F
  • createdAtMillis - 1707944231559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17577519674372426284F05003FBC3492B2DB0E47EF487B5EC91C966FAB620A1572D2A501D9FCF3B44F