Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 13:39:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regardless of your view on AI art, there is no requirement to explicitly state that AI art is such. Please keep the investigations to the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757751967437242628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219
  • createdAtMillis - 1707917968332
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17577519674372426280F5CEC9D0D4DA22021CD5BCB4F61CC5479FFE08D0D48B8E34005A9A00AC91219