Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 10:05:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD1B05B290F0DA68535E38FAF41F1A6BE348C370D405EEE407A82DB32C2ED67D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Both 1 and 9 are correct, it depends on the interpretation you have of it. It's purposefully written in an ambiguous way for interaction baiting, but nothing worth putting on a note. Y'all have comment sections for that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757676423085531402
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD1B05B290F0DA68535E38FAF41F1A6BE348C370D405EEE407A82DB32C2ED67D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707905151297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757676423085531402FD1B05B290F0DA68535E38FAF41F1A6BE348C370D405EEE407A82DB32C2ED67D