Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 09:40:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2542EBAA7A75C87A39828B0674334C1837338224D3E71D99F41763D04D4B486D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Die Quellen stellen nur Vermutungen ohne den geringsten Beweis dar. Geschäftsbeziehung alleine können absolut nicht als ausreichend gesehen werden, um so einen großen Vorwurf zu fundieren. Ohne Beweise gilt in DE selbst für die AFD die Unschuldsvermutung.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757576626303312096
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2542EBAA7A75C87A39828B0674334C1837338224D3E71D99F41763D04D4B486D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707903638918
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17575766263033120962542EBAA7A75C87A39828B0674334C1837338224D3E71D99F41763D04D4B486D