Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 09:26:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F73A6893314BC1771081E948E71C1730E395233F543E9CEDBEECCBFA5D7F7DA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Factually correct claim. Her reclaiming the spot is useful context, but both notes are written in an unpleasantly nerdy and rambling way. This probably belongs in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757556386685141024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F73A6893314BC1771081E948E71C1730E395233F543E9CEDBEECCBFA5D7F7DA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1707902765958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757556386685141024F73A6893314BC1771081E948E71C1730E395233F543E9CEDBEECCBFA5D7F7DA3