Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 01:21:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CC50598D6F1C5B39EE2D3EEC52327AFD6439AD2333C19426291E2EF579C0C2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Factually correct claim. Her reclaiming the spot is useful context, but both notes are written in an unpleasantly nerdy and rambling way. This probably belongs in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757556386685141024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CC50598D6F1C5B39EE2D3EEC52327AFD6439AD2333C19426291E2EF579C0C2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1707873678983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17575563866851410240CC50598D6F1C5B39EE2D3EEC52327AFD6439AD2333C19426291E2EF579C0C2A