Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-29 19:01:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 752A667478E92A0A40181BFFDE12C2AFB6F5793622CBA920E4FD85CAC9F4EDBC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The charitable status of LGBAlliance was never tested in a court of law, in point of fact the ruling stated that the plaintiff lacked standing to pursue the case. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jul/06/mermaids-v-lgb-alliance-whos-involved-in-tribunal-ruling

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757363731120390331
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 752A667478E92A0A40181BFFDE12C2AFB6F5793622CBA920E4FD85CAC9F4EDBC
  • createdAtMillis - 1709233275582
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757363731120390331752A667478E92A0A40181BFFDE12C2AFB6F5793622CBA920E4FD85CAC9F4EDBC