Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-13 08:11:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC45F1E3BAE977C1EB26E2CDE34C13E5C37F59AB4F3457E1D15EFD5DB875D97C
Participant Details

Original Note:

リプライで十分な内容ではないか。また、そもそも三重交通が信用出来るかも含めて疑問であるので三重交通側の発表をもって根拠とするのは無理がある。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757294649805586603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC45F1E3BAE977C1EB26E2CDE34C13E5C37F59AB4F3457E1D15EFD5DB875D97C
  • createdAtMillis - 1707811917841
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757294649805586603DC45F1E3BAE977C1EB26E2CDE34C13E5C37F59AB4F3457E1D15EFD5DB875D97C