Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-13 09:33:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A20C37164E1ABD6DFC59D3804A6E8E682B9E85177B5919B3497E4D17A4B33657
Participant Details

Original Note:

リプライで十分な内容ではないか。また、そもそも三重交通が信用出来るかも含めて疑問であるので三重交通側の発表をもって根拠とするのは無理がある。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757294649805586603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A20C37164E1ABD6DFC59D3804A6E8E682B9E85177B5919B3497E4D17A4B33657
  • createdAtMillis - 1707816833077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1757294649805586603A20C37164E1ABD6DFC59D3804A6E8E682B9E85177B5919B3497E4D17A4B33657