Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-13 10:38:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E0C14B2557BB876C5869BA18484DCD62F1F9E5F98A9BE52CFE788B63D2A4B25
Participant Details

Original Note:

リプライで十分な内容ではないか。また、そもそも三重交通が信用出来るかも含めて疑問であるので三重交通側の発表をもって根拠とするのは無理がある。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757294649805586603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E0C14B2557BB876C5869BA18484DCD62F1F9E5F98A9BE52CFE788B63D2A4B25
  • createdAtMillis - 1707820716571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17572946498055866039E0C14B2557BB876C5869BA18484DCD62F1F9E5F98A9BE52CFE788B63D2A4B25