Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-13 09:01:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41369B85CC9D3E97C1AF7D17E72FC26178F873DBD9D51F423D1D2C94D231557D
Participant Details

Original Note:

リプライで十分な内容ではないか。また、そもそも三重交通が信用出来るかも含めて疑問であるので三重交通側の発表をもって根拠とするのは無理がある。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757294649805586603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41369B85CC9D3E97C1AF7D17E72FC26178F873DBD9D51F423D1D2C94D231557D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707814864999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175729464980558660341369B85CC9D3E97C1AF7D17E72FC26178F873DBD9D51F423D1D2C94D231557D