Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-13 08:25:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0210DAB4D1983C8C8DB7B447D51D1018DDA830B80294A622DA0FE8A229BFB1A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

リプライで十分な内容ではないか。また、そもそも三重交通が信用出来るかも含めて疑問であるので三重交通側の発表をもって根拠とするのは無理がある。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757294649805586603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0210DAB4D1983C8C8DB7B447D51D1018DDA830B80294A622DA0FE8A229BFB1A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1707812754684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17572946498055866030210DAB4D1983C8C8DB7B447D51D1018DDA830B80294A622DA0FE8A229BFB1A6