Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 19:50:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - compared to average places, Rafah can be considered densely populated right now, especially due to internal displacement that the above statistics haven't taken into account. Focussing on the density claim also misses the salient point of the post

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1757124946457948588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E
  • createdAtMillis - 1707767414809
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175712494645794858864C3067AF05271E25F5E380F6DD97F3C1BFFD02DBA4956767AA2F6CAB576174E