Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-21 21:15:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38500647F383B8AB66EEE420AC8F5484BF0EFC970F6768807850A42F07E35B12
Participant Details

Original Note:

The High Court found it would have been unconstitutional to continue detaining the people in question. Some had been convicted of crimes, but had served their sentences. https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports-news-commentary/2023/11/29/explainer-high-court-ruling-in-nzyq

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756972717398720839
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38500647F383B8AB66EEE420AC8F5484BF0EFC970F6768807850A42F07E35B12
  • createdAtMillis - 1713734127859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175697271739872083938500647F383B8AB66EEE420AC8F5484BF0EFC970F6768807850A42F07E35B12