Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 18:59:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8ABFC29DC126A368D4FE3ADDBCDCA6AC0CBE85EB695F3B796825DE7D5E7BFD8
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn. The New York Times still posted and endorsed both of these articles. If they didn't stand by one or both them then they would have been removed. One being an "opinion piece" is irrelevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756864010463395885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E8ABFC29DC126A368D4FE3ADDBCDCA6AC0CBE85EB695F3B796825DE7D5E7BFD8
  • createdAtMillis - 1707937169624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1756864010463395885E8ABFC29DC126A368D4FE3ADDBCDCA6AC0CBE85EB695F3B796825DE7D5E7BFD8