Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 21:41:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 892D3CF2E01CA8FDF5BB6C84E69B7A2A70C406BEA84DEA99789CD331CF5282E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn. The New York Times still posted and endorsed both of these articles. If they didn't stand by one or both them then they would have been removed. One being an "opinion piece" is irrelevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756864010463395885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 892D3CF2E01CA8FDF5BB6C84E69B7A2A70C406BEA84DEA99789CD331CF5282E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1707774073649
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1756864010463395885892D3CF2E01CA8FDF5BB6C84E69B7A2A70C406BEA84DEA99789CD331CF5282E7