Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 23:00:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5203D7DB326BE6107DF7F05AF7C70206879372066642C1EEFC34697D511745B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn. The New York Times still posted and endorsed both of these articles. If they didn't stand by one or both them then they would have been removed. One being an "opinion piece" is irrelevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756864010463395885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5203D7DB326BE6107DF7F05AF7C70206879372066642C1EEFC34697D511745B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1707778847108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17568640104633958855203D7DB326BE6107DF7F05AF7C70206879372066642C1EEFC34697D511745B1