Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 04:05:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AAD63A1AD0AB28BC9129F9AE34564CCA783F67717803CC16EC524435C174448
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn. The New York Times still posted and endorsed both of these articles. If they didn't stand by one or both them then they would have been removed. One being an "opinion piece" is irrelevant

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756864010463395885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2AAD63A1AD0AB28BC9129F9AE34564CCA783F67717803CC16EC524435C174448
  • createdAtMillis - 1707710728813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17568640104633958852AAD63A1AD0AB28BC9129F9AE34564CCA783F67717803CC16EC524435C174448