Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 05:51:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED3A6AD361DC7110F98B42DC49C2A44149B601C678FCAD35504CBE626DCC3149
Participant Details

Original Note:

While people make the point that the author never explicitly said that it was real. There's an arguement that it could still benefit from added context as it could easily be assumed that it was a real photo Google.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756836316044787760
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED3A6AD361DC7110F98B42DC49C2A44149B601C678FCAD35504CBE626DCC3149
  • createdAtMillis - 1707717099644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1756836316044787760ED3A6AD361DC7110F98B42DC49C2A44149B601C678FCAD35504CBE626DCC3149