Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 04:11:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88471396D85EA02D1D633C0FA8710C8B87EA56698A65D9E46D0CF93E4D234CC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

While people make the point that the author never explicitly said that it was real. There's an arguement that it could still benefit from added context as it could easily be assumed that it was a real photo Google.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756836316044787760
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88471396D85EA02D1D633C0FA8710C8B87EA56698A65D9E46D0CF93E4D234CC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1707711095987
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175683631604478776088471396D85EA02D1D633C0FA8710C8B87EA56698A65D9E46D0CF93E4D234CC9