Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 14:35:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31D0A6EAA1CA0F79A9987B98532013F0E7A3E9D27160F4F86DA907F7CC3B7159
Participant Details

Original Note:

While people make the point that the author never explicitly said that it was real. There's an arguement that it could still benefit from added context as it could easily be assumed that it was a real photo Google.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756836316044787760
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31D0A6EAA1CA0F79A9987B98532013F0E7A3E9D27160F4F86DA907F7CC3B7159
  • createdAtMillis - 1707748551604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175683631604478776031D0A6EAA1CA0F79A9987B98532013F0E7A3E9D27160F4F86DA907F7CC3B7159