Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 07:12:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 098C4ABBD353665EEFBD33E2206B30EE264E4ABFCC7D04D98B4ECE60D9FC33EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

While people make the point that the author never explicitly said that it was real. There's an arguement that it could still benefit from added context as it could easily be assumed that it was a real photo Google.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756836316044787760
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 098C4ABBD353665EEFBD33E2206B30EE264E4ABFCC7D04D98B4ECE60D9FC33EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1707721944999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1756836316044787760098C4ABBD353665EEFBD33E2206B30EE264E4ABFCC7D04D98B4ECE60D9FC33EF