Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-11 21:00:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AA1853BEAD0BE96E9FFB952A4FA55825F1119BF1D11F444B1F3B58397106170
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT piece was an opinion piece that said Ramaswamy should be Trump's VP but not because he was a good candidate. The piece referred to him as being or having: “Extreme unscrupulousness”, “peak opportunism”, “moral contortionist”, “suck-up”, and an “ultimate sellout” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/01/opinion/trump-vivek-ramaswamy-vice-president.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756781456330744062
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AA1853BEAD0BE96E9FFB952A4FA55825F1119BF1D11F444B1F3B58397106170
  • createdAtMillis - 1707685249776
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17567814563307440626AA1853BEAD0BE96E9FFB952A4FA55825F1119BF1D11F444B1F3B58397106170