Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 01:34:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 12AC8E18952537E313B31AD4E7D5A87072F9AE05C0AB91D3A05CC9ABB385A4F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT piece was an opinion piece that said Ramaswamy should be Trump's VP but not because he was a good candidate. The piece referred to him as being or having: “Extreme unscrupulousness”, “peak opportunism”, “moral contortionist”, “suck-up”, and an “ultimate sellout” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/01/opinion/trump-vivek-ramaswamy-vice-president.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756781456330744062
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 12AC8E18952537E313B31AD4E7D5A87072F9AE05C0AB91D3A05CC9ABB385A4F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1707701648156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175678145633074406212AC8E18952537E313B31AD4E7D5A87072F9AE05C0AB91D3A05CC9ABB385A4F2