Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-10 12:39:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dizer que a matéria é tendenciosa porque a defesa alegou que recebeu o documento diretamente do inquérito é pura especulação. Isso é só a versão da defesa. A maté só exibe factualmente a explicação que a defesa deu.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1756143602156102020
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1
  • createdAtMillis - 1707568759667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175614360215610202017A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1