Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 12:49:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C3650E1327863AF773B82CBAF4CFE4EB6B05D754CDF939F43CA2E94A1272E54
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is not accurate to say that this tweet is "100% defamation, by any standard". To prove prima facie defamation requires the plaintiff to show "damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755847121717367067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C3650E1327863AF773B82CBAF4CFE4EB6B05D754CDF939F43CA2E94A1272E54
  • createdAtMillis - 1707482967363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17558471217173670675C3650E1327863AF773B82CBAF4CFE4EB6B05D754CDF939F43CA2E94A1272E54