Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 15:00:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BE42690DF6F8CADF9997717AE5EF475986147A4B8F1AFD9C3D82DCE1C18B846
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is not accurate to say that this tweet is "100% defamation, by any standard". To prove prima facie defamation requires the plaintiff to show "damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755847121717367067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BE42690DF6F8CADF9997717AE5EF475986147A4B8F1AFD9C3D82DCE1C18B846
  • createdAtMillis - 1707490853082
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17558471217173670672BE42690DF6F8CADF9997717AE5EF475986147A4B8F1AFD9C3D82DCE1C18B846