Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-10 00:13:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25D0FA1A0D5A3D4582875683C9B0CBB5D4721956AF3D67AC8E65D813CC9F2209
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is not accurate to say that this tweet is "100% defamation, by any standard". To prove prima facie defamation requires the plaintiff to show "damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755847121717367067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25D0FA1A0D5A3D4582875683C9B0CBB5D4721956AF3D67AC8E65D813CC9F2209
  • createdAtMillis - 1707524011980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175584712171736706725D0FA1A0D5A3D4582875683C9B0CBB5D4721956AF3D67AC8E65D813CC9F2209