Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 07:52:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03516078F5EDA56E0A39B32EA7BA8A72EEA7A03125CE1F9DF6BCA9A4DC88C405
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim has been retracted and apologised for, by the claimant, citing it was a rumour. Link to CNews claimant's apology post https://x.com/KraemerIfrahSan/status/1755593443039138253?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755839451006488763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03516078F5EDA56E0A39B32EA7BA8A72EEA7A03125CE1F9DF6BCA9A4DC88C405
  • createdAtMillis - 1707465168705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175583945100648876303516078F5EDA56E0A39B32EA7BA8A72EEA7A03125CE1F9DF6BCA9A4DC88C405