Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-26 02:46:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8C3BFC7C1CED44DB5F5F79F83D54EAF4F7E79540CE88F3C2C1A143AA764CB763
Participant Details
Original Note:
Lawyers defending Tucker Carlson argued in open court that his statements on television were so hyperbolic, that a reasonable viewer wouldn’t consider them to be factual. Factual statements are critical part of being a journalist: https://www.ifj.org/who/rules-and-policy/global-charter-of-ethics-for-journalists https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye
All Note Details