Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-08 22:51:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6
Participant Details
Original Note:
Lawyers defending Tucker Carlson argued in open court that his statements on television were so hyperbolic, that a reasonable viewer wouldn’t consider them to be factual. Factual statements are critical part of being a journalist: https://www.ifj.org/who/rules-and-policy/global-charter-of-ethics-for-journalists https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye
All Note Details