Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 03:56:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEA3C67C5D368642B895208E8339648EA9ABC6C0DF713F9B9A5FC930A1F94EF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is based on a well known and debunked logical fallacy to further a pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design, which lacks any supporting evidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_analogy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755665299037450312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FEA3C67C5D368642B895208E8339648EA9ABC6C0DF713F9B9A5FC930A1F94EF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1708142192288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1755665299037450312FEA3C67C5D368642B895208E8339648EA9ABC6C0DF713F9B9A5FC930A1F94EF8