Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 07:13:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAE88299FD6D64CCAEE109446ADD2A6AD9A832716A3B05F9F115DA320EC4D45C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is based on a well known and debunked logical fallacy to further a pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design, which lacks any supporting evidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_analogy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755665299037450312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAE88299FD6D64CCAEE109446ADD2A6AD9A832716A3B05F9F115DA320EC4D45C
  • createdAtMillis - 1709018010700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755665299037450312BAE88299FD6D64CCAEE109446ADD2A6AD9A832716A3B05F9F115DA320EC4D45C