Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-12 00:37:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3362CA605346945375970CE797080971AC82326B903EFB5C3376CBAB74AC086B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is based on a well known and debunked logical fallacy to further a pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design, which lacks any supporting evidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_analogy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755665299037450312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3362CA605346945375970CE797080971AC82326B903EFB5C3376CBAB74AC086B
  • createdAtMillis - 1707698243367
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17556652990374503123362CA605346945375970CE797080971AC82326B903EFB5C3376CBAB74AC086B