Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 11:26:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

A fonte da matéria mostrada no post é uma publicação da Nature (set/2019). Logo em março/2020, os editores da revista publicaram uma nota desautorizando as conclusões do artigo por erros metodológicos e factuais. Os autores foram instados corrigí-los e se omitiram. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62398-w

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755657453348249880
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1707478008045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755657453348249880E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2