Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 18:33:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14CF43F536125F1E09A264AB9F3C38A55255D2554D0CD95F87FDF88FD45BBFA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Paper quoted contrasts to alt scientific papers. Single medical author’s previous antivax publications/speeches marked flawed, inaccurate, incorrect, unsupported, on health feedback.org. Dangerous antivax tweet based on selective evidence by author whose credibility is questioned https://healthfeedback.org/authors/peter-mccullough/ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13524585221150881 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X23003328 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2800743 https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/review_article/pdf/163598/20230909-21324-hp9i3q.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755592727553798155
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14CF43F536125F1E09A264AB9F3C38A55255D2554D0CD95F87FDF88FD45BBFA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1707417209061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175559272755379815514CF43F536125F1E09A264AB9F3C38A55255D2554D0CD95F87FDF88FD45BBFA3