Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 10:57:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C02084F9AA67CC2B5BEFF443D5F2B3EC70D3CF07E78B359D7026A7521FFEAA19
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN "did not call for a ceasefire" and "no evidence of genocide" mean different things. In reality, the ICJ case arguing that there is a genocide was deemed "plausible", and the case continues. That could not happen with "no evidence" as the proposed note falsely claims. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/01/gaza-icj-ruling-offers-hope-protection-civilians-enduring-apocalyptic

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755542621773041808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C02084F9AA67CC2B5BEFF443D5F2B3EC70D3CF07E78B359D7026A7521FFEAA19
  • createdAtMillis - 1707389830848
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755542621773041808C02084F9AA67CC2B5BEFF443D5F2B3EC70D3CF07E78B359D7026A7521FFEAA19