Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 12:35:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C89E0110706319AF9132AD17FE256CE6EFF67768C87BE37F56E1A2519FED6FB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling did not "expose" Reid's ties. His stake was already public and widely discussed, including on his personal website. Reid proactively disclosed these to the Ethics Commissioner and requested to be informed of compliance requirements, which he complied with. https://scottreid.ca/submission-to-the-clerk-of-the-house-of-commons-respecting-my-private-interest-relating-to-bills-c-56-and-c-352/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755461639040536755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C89E0110706319AF9132AD17FE256CE6EFF67768C87BE37F56E1A2519FED6FB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1707395751763
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755461639040536755C89E0110706319AF9132AD17FE256CE6EFF67768C87BE37F56E1A2519FED6FB3