Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 18:47:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 706D634F558BEFBB706DD5D0726E06B2A88783593B433349BF61642AD174D8D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling did not "expose" Reid's ties. His stake was already public and widely discussed, including on his personal website. Reid proactively disclosed these to the Ethics Commissioner and requested to be informed of compliance requirements, which he complied with. https://scottreid.ca/submission-to-the-clerk-of-the-house-of-commons-respecting-my-private-interest-relating-to-bills-c-56-and-c-352/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755461639040536755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 706D634F558BEFBB706DD5D0726E06B2A88783593B433349BF61642AD174D8D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1707418050854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755461639040536755706D634F558BEFBB706DD5D0726E06B2A88783593B433349BF61642AD174D8D3