Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 22:24:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5FC2C11294C86FF0484365F5F31DA54BCC35B503359C8999ED056D172464DF11
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling did not "expose" Reid's ties. His stake was already public and widely discussed, including on his personal website. Reid proactively disclosed these to the Ethics Commissioner and requested to be informed of compliance requirements, which he complied with. https://scottreid.ca/submission-to-the-clerk-of-the-house-of-commons-respecting-my-private-interest-relating-to-bills-c-56-and-c-352/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755461639040536755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5FC2C11294C86FF0484365F5F31DA54BCC35B503359C8999ED056D172464DF11
  • createdAtMillis - 1707431046503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17554616390405367555FC2C11294C86FF0484365F5F31DA54BCC35B503359C8999ED056D172464DF11