Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 15:26:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C7397875641D618126CE985A034921602328A94822531E94C297120A38F2718
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling did not "expose" Reid's ties. His stake was already public and widely discussed, including on his personal website. Reid proactively disclosed these to the Ethics Commissioner and requested to be informed of compliance requirements, which he complied with. https://scottreid.ca/submission-to-the-clerk-of-the-house-of-commons-respecting-my-private-interest-relating-to-bills-c-56-and-c-352/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755461639040536755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C7397875641D618126CE985A034921602328A94822531E94C297120A38F2718
  • createdAtMillis - 1707406019198
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17554616390405367555C7397875641D618126CE985A034921602328A94822531E94C297120A38F2718