Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 00:14:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E272404A864FB08BB26E573CB247F840F834DA55D5C1820111D5617FF3FDF41
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling did not "expose" Reid's ties. His stake was already public and widely discussed, including on his personal website. Reid proactively disclosed these to the Ethics Commissioner and requested to be informed of compliance requirements, which he complied with. https://scottreid.ca/submission-to-the-clerk-of-the-house-of-commons-respecting-my-private-interest-relating-to-bills-c-56-and-c-352/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755461639040536755
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E272404A864FB08BB26E573CB247F840F834DA55D5C1820111D5617FF3FDF41
  • createdAtMillis - 1707437691505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17554616390405367552E272404A864FB08BB26E573CB247F840F834DA55D5C1820111D5617FF3FDF41