Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-12 12:43:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF50494ABDA697AFEB61F141C553C7F8399BCB262E2AC744F175A35FD4A8A49A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN While CA is an at will state, it has several antidiscrimination laws, including Cal. Lab. Code 1101 &1102, which could arguably cover the statements at issue here. See Napear v Bonneville Intl. Co. (2023) Pgs 16-22 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.caed.401956/gov.uscourts.caed.401956.65.0.pdf Debates about the case strength belong in replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755329164310122832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF50494ABDA697AFEB61F141C553C7F8399BCB262E2AC744F175A35FD4A8A49A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715517814542
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755329164310122832FF50494ABDA697AFEB61F141C553C7F8399BCB262E2AC744F175A35FD4A8A49A