Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 22:34:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C420F00C8BD02CB4D808CAF7A20BB90CDDE8E9F9246B4FF7A13037FBE50915F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attention aux notes qui comporte des commentaires personnels. De nombreux juristes et avocats estiment que prouver l’absence de consentement posera de sérieuses difficultés aux victimes. Le « + extensif » est un avis perso infondé qui n’a pas sa place dans une note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755296021863649785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C420F00C8BD02CB4D808CAF7A20BB90CDDE8E9F9246B4FF7A13037FBE50915F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1707431659504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755296021863649785C420F00C8BD02CB4D808CAF7A20BB90CDDE8E9F9246B4FF7A13037FBE50915F3