Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 19:45:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A50DD902D3CDAC3265084C25BB380336D9C823FA5850DE366AD25C985EAFC52D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attention aux notes qui comporte des commentaires personnels. De nombreux juristes et avocats estiment que prouver l’absence de consentement posera de sérieuses difficultés aux victimes. Le « + extensif » est un avis perso infondé qui n’a pas sa place dans une note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755296021863649785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A50DD902D3CDAC3265084C25BB380336D9C823FA5850DE366AD25C985EAFC52D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707421513396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755296021863649785A50DD902D3CDAC3265084C25BB380336D9C823FA5850DE366AD25C985EAFC52D